The debate around MFA often circles back to implementation variability—how strong is the second factor? A weak SMS code provides minimal uplift against a determined attacker. WWPass bypasses this debate entirely by focusing on a single, maximally strong authentication vector rooted in hardware security. My interest is in documenting the comparative security gains: moving from an additive model (Factor A + Factor B) to a deeply integrated, single-point-of-truth model derived from the client’s trusted execution environment. This inherently protects against the most common bypasses seen in MFA exploits, as there is no static password to harvest, and the underlying cryptographic proof is far more resilient to man-in-the-middle or replay attacks that plague less sophisticated second-factor implementations.